27 Oct
2005
27 Oct
'05
2:59 p.m.
Hi Klaus,
as I see on http://developer.berlios.de/projects/radiusclient-ng/, 0.5.0
is not longer posted?!? So, 5.1 will be fine.
regarding the TLS. I was thinking to have two packages - one without TLS
(as so far) and another one with TLS. The reason? I don't want to force
dependencies to openssl for people not interested in TLS.
As the packages will overlap, they must conflict at installation.
regards,
Bogdan
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi!
some question: for radius support - is radiusclient-ng 5.1 fine?
what about TLS: IMO it should be compiled by default, or we should
have both: packages with TLS and without TLS support.
I think it is not a good idea to announce "first TLS-enabled" SIP
proxy and then the compiled packages are not TLS capable. Thus, then
we also has to add the openssl packages to the requriments for the
openser package.
regards
klaus
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello everybody,
I would like to ask all of you that have access to different OS
distributions to help with package generation. Please reply
(personally if you prefer better this way) with OS name, version and
architecture. We are looking mainly for common used distributions:
Debian - testing (the other two are accounted already)
Redhat
Suse
Open/NetBSD (FreeBSD accounted)
SUN/Solaris
Gentoo
...
We will help as much as possible with guidelines. We would require
tomorrow an early compiling on all available systems to fix eventual
warnings.
Cheers,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users