21 Feb
2014
21 Feb
'14
1:25 a.m.
Fred,
in you ACME replacement, kamailio doesn’t rewrite headers for handling RTP/SIGNALING and
stay in the middle?
Il giorno 21/feb/2014, alle ore 00:03, Fred Posner <fred(a)palner.com> ha scritto:
On 2/20/14, 5:55 PM, Francesco Maria Magnini wrote:
@Carsten
I looked at http://www.iptel.org/sems and seems to be only broken links to downloads.
Do you know if the project is still maintained?
@Fred
Are you using openser as a B2BUA?
No, because of course Kamailio is not a b2bua. =)
In the case of the ACME replacement, we used it to:
- handle NAT (rtpproxy)
- user regs
- load balance
- lcr
- security
- routing
and some other little hacks.
--
Fred Posner | The Palner Group, Inc.
http://qxork.com
Il giorno 20/feb/2014, alle ore 19:42, Fred Posner <fred(a)palner.com> ha scritto:
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users Alex's article is one of my favorites. That
being said, we switched out an Acme SBC for openser (at the time) and was immediately
thrilled.
Fred Posner
The Palner Group, Inc.
503-914-0999 (direct)
954-472-2896 (fax)
On 02/20/2014 01:14 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Francesco,
Have a look at this blog post:
http://www.likewise.am/2013/03/kamailio-as-an-sbc-session-border-controller/
That said, I agree with Carsten's suggestion of SEMS.
On 02/20/2014 11:04 AM, Francesco Maria Magnini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to have some suggestions about a full replacement of an
> ACME Packet Net-Net Session Border Controller.
> By now, ACME SBC performs all the SBC functionalities, mainly:
>
> - it is used as a SIP endpoint for SIP client registrations
> - it is used as a SIP endpoint for interconnection to multiple SIP
> carriers via SIP trunks
> - it is used for NAT traversal
>
> In this deployment, the SIP Server communicates only with the SBC and
> this one takes care of the communication between the SIP Server and
> the external SIP entities (UA clients, SIP Trunks).
> In this scenario, can I consider to replace the SBC with Kamailio?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users