here is my routes
route {
#-----------------------------------------------------------------
# Sanity Check Section
#-----------------------------------------------------------------
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
sl_send_reply("483", "Too Many Hops");
break;
};
if (msg:len > max_len) {
sl_send_reply("513", "Message
Overflow");
break;
};
#-----------------------------------------------------------------
# Record Route Section
#-----------------------------------------------------------------
if (method!="REGISTER") {
record_route();
};
if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") {
unforce_rtp_proxy();
#-----------------------------------------------------------------
# Loose Route Section
#-----------------------------------------------------------------
if (loose_route()) {
if (has_totag() && method=="INVITE") {
if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
setflag(6);
force_rport();
fix_nated_contact();
};
#log("hello");
force_rtp_proxy("l");
};
route(1);
break;
};
#-----------------------------------------------------------------
# Call Type Processing Section
#-----------------------------------------------------------------
if (uri==myself) {
if (method=="INVITE") {
route(3);
break;
} else if (method=="REGISTER") {
route(2);
break;
};
if (!lookup("location")) {
sl_send_reply("404", "User Not
Found");
break;
};
route(1);
};
}
route[1] {
#-----------------------------------------------------------------
# Default Message Handler
#-----------------------------------------------------------------
t_on_reply("1");
if (!t_relay()) {
if (method=="INVITE" && isflagset(6))
{
unforce_rtp_proxy();
};
sl_reply_error();
};
}
route[2] {
#-----------------------------------------------------------------
# REGISTER Message Handler
#----------------------------------------------------------------
if (!search("^Contact: \*") &&
nat_uac_test("19")) {
setflag(6);
fix_nated_register();
force_rport();
};
sl_send_reply("100", "Trying");
if (!save("location")) {
sl_reply_error();
};
}
route[3] {
#-----------------------------------------------------------------
# INVITE Message Handler
#-----------------------------------------------------------------
exec_msg("cat >> /tmp/withoutstrip.log");
if(uri=="^sip:00[1-9].*@.*") {
route(4);
break;
} else if (uri=="^sip:0[1-9].*@.*") {
strip(1);
route(5);
break;
} else {
route(4);
break;
}
}
route[4] {
rewritehostport("127.0.0.1:5970");
force_rport();
fix_nated_contact();
t_relay();
}
route[5] {
if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
setflag(6);
}
if (!lookup("location")) {
break;
}
if (isflagset(6)) {
force_rport();
fix_nated_contact();
force_rtp_proxy();
};
t_on_reply("1");
if (!t_relay()) {
if(isflagset(6)) {
unforce_rtp_proxy();
}
sl_reply_error();
};
}
onreply_route[1] {
if (isflagset(6) &&
status=~"(180)|(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") {
fix_nated_contact();
if (!search("^Content-Length:\ 0")) {
force_rtp_proxy();
};
}
else if (nat_uac_test("1")) {
fix_nated_contact();
};
}
--- Iqbal <iqbal(a)gigo.co.uk> wrote:
loop detected, when the call gets to asterisk what
are you telling
asterisk to do, send it back to ser, or out
somewhere else.
Calls are not workinf after the change or before.
iqbal
Kamran Ahmad wrote:
i m only sending invite to asterisk one when i
try
bindaddr=0.0.0.0
calls are not working. now i changed sip.conf
bindaddr=0.0.0.0
and in ser.cfg
port=5060
with these changes now register messages are stoped
but still getting 482 "Loop Detected".
--- Iqbal <iqbal(a)gigo.co.uk> wrote:
>Hi
>
>The register messages what username are they for,
>and from what IP
>address, do a sip debug in asterisk for this.
>Also why are you sending register messages to
>asterisk, just send your
>INVITES there.
>
>As for debug run ngrep, to pick up your messages ,
>and see what is going
>on, and to look at the uri problem, remove 2 out
of
>3 of the routes, and
>see what happens, if call fails then matching is
not
>correctly being
>done, or the uri is not correct.
>
>iqbal
>
>Kamran Ahmad wrote:
>
>
>
>>i tried to do debug (put messages in
/tmp/call.log)
>>
>>
>>but there is no Invite having only one zero(like
>>06999786) all call were 0097937223 or 46364736.
>>
>>
>this
>
>
>>means that only third else part is always active
>>
>>
>but
>
>
>>if third part is active then there must be some
>>
>>
>invite
>
>
>>starting with only one zero. it means second time
>>invite call is not comming here .
>>
>>My from main invites are only comming here
>>
>>
>route(3). i
>
>
>>think all messages are going to asterisk because
>>
>>
>there
>
>
>>is only one statement in ser.cfg having port 5970
>>(this is for asterisk) and all my register
messages
>>are also going there to asterisk.
>>
>>there are too many register messages on my
>>
>>
>asterisk. i
>
>
>>dont know why they are comming to asterisk as
this
>>port is not available for any user nobody
uses
this
>>port only ser is routing calls to
asterisk
>>
>>route {
>> if (uri==myself) {
>> if (method=="INVITE") {
>> route(3);
>> break;
>> }
>> }
>>}
>>route[3] {
>> exec_msg("cat >> /tmp/call.log");
>> if(uri=="^sip:00[1-9].*@.*") {
>> route(4);
>> break;
>> } else if (uri=="^sip:0[1-9].*@.*") {
>> strip(1);
>> route(5);
>> break;
>> } else {
>> route(4);
>> break;
>> }
>>
>>}
>>--- Iqbal <iqbal(a)gigo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>dump a call trace showing your uri
>>>
>>>Iqbal
>>>
>>>Kamran Ahmad wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>hello
>>>>
>>>>i m using ser-0.9.0 on 5060 and asterisk-1.0.9
on
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>5970
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>but problem is that i cannot send my ser back
to
>>>>asterisk.
>>>>the problem is that it always goto route(4)
>>>>
>>>>
>second
>
>
>>>>else if is not properly checked how to check
this
>>>>condition. i m adding 0 when
asterisk is
sending
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>call
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>back.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> if(uri=="^sip:00[1-9]+@.*") {
>>>> route(4);
>>>> break;
>>>> } else if (uri=="^sip:0[1-9]+@.*") {
>>>> strip(1);
>>>> route(5);
>>>> break;
>>>> } else {
>>>> route(4);
>>>> break;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>__________________________________
>>>>Do you Yahoo!?
>>>>Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail
=== message
truncated ===
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around