Have you had the chance to do any testing? It will help deciding to push
the commit to branch 5.3 for the release of 5.3.4.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 05.05.20 09:55, Chris Martineau wrote:
Thanks Daniel,
Will test and advise.
Chris
*From:*sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> *On Behalf Of
*Daniel-Constantin Mierla
*Sent:* 04 May 2020 19:09
*To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
*Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] PRACK support in RTPENGINE module?
I pushed a patch to rtpengine module to handle PRACK in both manage()
and answer() functions.
Chris: can you test and see if works as expected? If yes, it will be
backported.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 04.05.20 19:51, Alex Balashov wrote:
Oh, sorry. I misread; it seemed to me that
rtpengine_answer1_f() was
part of a cascade of fixup functions that goes back to
rtpengine_manage(), but not to _answer(). You're right of course.
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 07:49:19PM +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Chris mentioned that rtpengine_answer() is also not supporting (or is
> ruling out all request types but ACK), so the C code is limiting in
both
> cases, no matter using rtpengine_manage() or
rtpengine_answer().
>
> The rtpengine manage() was built as a wrapper around offer()/answer()
> and it makes the decision of which one is executed in various cases
> (request/reply/failure route), but not what offer()/answer() functions
> do internally.
>
> So in this case the code has to allow execution for PRACK, it was an
> omission, likely not a scenario that popped up so far.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 04.05.20 19:22, Alex Balashov wrote:
>> Hello Chris,
>>
>> rtpengine_manage() is just a wrapper that makes context-sensitive
>> invocations of rtpengine_offer() and rtpengine_answer(), so that you
>> don't have to choose which of them to call manually. But it's not
>> perfect.
>>
>> There are nevertheless situations where this manual use of the
>> offer/answer functions is necessary, and it sounds like this is one of
>> them.
>>
>> There is a larger question of whether rtpengine_manage() should
support
>> PRACK; it seems like the answer is yes.
But this lacking cannot be
>> framed as "RTPEngine doesn't support PRACK" or anything like that.
>> RTPEngine can support any SDP-bearing request and reply, since
RTPEngine
>> does not care about SIP semantics per
se.
>>
>> -- Alex
>>
>> --
>> Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
>>
>> Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
>> Web:
http://www.evaristesys.com/ <http://www.evaristesys.com>,
http://www.csrpswitch.com/ <http://www.csrpswitch.com>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
>>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
<https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla --
www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
>
www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
<https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web:
http://www.evaristesys.com/ <http://www.evaristesys.com/>,
http://www.csrpswitch.com/ <http://www.csrpswitch.com/>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla --
www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
*Disclaimer*
Semafone is a limited company, registered in England, with registered
number 06963868. Our registered office is at Pannell House, Park
Street, Guildford, Surrey, GU1 4HN, United Kingdom. The information
contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is
intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to
receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that
any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this email in error, please send it
back to us, and immediately and permanently delete it.
This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been
automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a
Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place
for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving
and compliance. To find out more Click Here
(
https://protect-eu.mimecast.com/s/6sS0CE8WmI1xZECyHvaY?domain=linkprotect.c…)
Although Semafone has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no
viruses are present in this email, Semafone cannot accept
responsibility for any loss or damage sustained as a result of
computer viruses and the recipient must ensure that the email (and any
attachments) are virus free.