On Tuesday 02 December 2003 21:56, Sesha B wrote:
Oops.. I have the second fifo as /tmp/vm_ser_fifo. I was just messing around changing those while I was testing. So, it is not working with a different fifo too.
I dont know if it is messed too, but ser.cfg contains 'fork=no', which means that this Ser instance will only listen on the first interface (normaly the loopback interface).
Nils
-----Original Message----- From: Nils Ohlmeier [mailto:nils@iptel.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 3:44 PM To: sesha@iic.com Cc: serusers Subject: Re: [Serusers] Re: voicemail config
I guess your second Ser is not starting, because then path and name of the fifo is the same for both Ser instances.
Nils
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 21:27, Sesha B wrote:
Yeah, I'm listening on the loopback. I observed something interesting.
When
I stop the first instance, the second instance (Which earlier used to go
to
the voicemail directly), is also not working. It works only if I change
the
port back to 5060 on the second instance of SER. I dont understand where I am doing wrong. I'm attaching my ser.cfg and ser-vm.cfg. Please help.
Thank
you.
-----Original Message----- From: Nils Ohlmeier [mailto:nils@iptel.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 2:33 PM To: sesha@iic.com; Jan Janak; Mario Kolberg Cc: Klaus Darilion; serusers Subject: Re: [Serusers] Re: voicemail config
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 20:35, Sesha B wrote:
I am running two instances of SER on the same machine. One is the
regular
config running on 5060 and the other is the voicemail config running on 5090. I also have a different fifo file for both of the configs. I dont
see
any traffic on the port 5090 at all. I mean, the call is not forwarded
to
the voicemail. Please help. Thank you.
Are you sure that you listen on the correct interface? Loopback interface in this case, e.g. 'ngrep -d lo port 5090'.
Regards Nils
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers