Re: [SR-Users] htable persistation question

Hi Daniel, Yes - most probably it is due to the same table names. Thanks for the hint. Attila From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Daniel-Constantin Mierla Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 6:32 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] htable persistation question Hello, as I can see, all the three hash tables defined in memory use the same database table. Is it what you want? Shouldn't be there different database tables for each memory table? Cheers, Daniel On 31/03/15 13:14, Attila Megyeri wrote: Hi, We are having problem with persisting htable. There are 4 hashtables defined in kamailio config, like: modparam("htable", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("htable", "htable", "vtp=>size=10;autoexpire=120;dbtable=htable;dbmode=1;") modparam("htable", "htable", "a=>size=6;") modparam("htable", "htable", "rpn=>size=10;autoexpire=0;dbtable=htable;dbmode=1;"); modparam("htable", "htable", "rpnn=>size=10;autoexpire=0;dbtable=htable;dbmode=1;"); The strange behavior is that if I restart kamailio, the hash table is not persisted into the database. If I change e.g. rpn's dbtable to e.g. htable_1 (which should be created in the kamailio mysql database schema upfront, then the rpn hashtable will be presisted successfully at every stop and will be reload at every start. What is wrong in my config? Kamailio version is 4.2.3 Thanks, Attila _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com