9 May
2007
9 May
'07
12:40 a.m.
Excellent news. Thanks for the feedback. Overall, and please don't take this
negatively, I think documentation for SER is difficult for beginners, so if we have to go
through the learning curve anyway, we might as well do it in the newer version.
Thanks again
On Tue, May 8, 2007 5:04 pm, SIP <sip(a)arcdiv.com> said:
For all intents and purposes, SER 2.0 (the new one) is
ready for use.
The only thing it's really waiting on to be 'stable' is some better
documentation. However, it's best, if you're just getting started, to
deploy with the new version and maybe muddle your way through a bit
until documentation is complete.
N.
lists(a)infoway.net wrote:
We are planning on deploying a couple of SER
servers and integrate them with
either SEMS or Asterisk for voicemail. However, we are a bit confused as to which
version of SER to go with? From what we can tell, the latest stable version is
0.9.6. However, we know of the new 0.10.X version. Reading up on the site, there
is some documentation that explains a little bit of the differences and/or
migration recommendations/steps.
So, in an effort to keep life as simple as possible, which version should we work
with? We are afraid that if we go through a learning cycle with 0.9.6 we're going
to "suffer" when migrating to the new version, either because of the learning
curve or because of a potential painful migration process.
Any recommendations?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers