Re: [Serusers] Call waiting and accounting

No, that should do it. Unless the in-call INVITEs don't have Route headers. Then you have a buggy UA... g-) inge wrote: > Hmm, but I account before if (loose_route()). > > So I do : > > if (method=="BYE || ... && !loose_route()) > setflag(1); > }; > > Can I do an other thing ? > > Le vendredi 11 mai 2007 à 14:55 +0200, Greger V. Teigre a écrit : > > > No, you have to make sure that INVITEs that go into your if > > (loose_route()) { ... } don't get accounted. > > g-) > > > > inge wrote: > > > > > Thanks for your answer. > > > I use accounting in route{}. So I just need to add a !loose_route() in > > > my if block when I want to account for INVITE and ACK request ? > > > > > > Le vendredi 11 mai 2007 à 12:06 +0200, Greger V. Teigre a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > That's because the other call is put on hold and an INVITE is sent with > > > > 0.0.0.0 as IP address to indicate that. > > > > Such INVITEs will be loose_route'd in your script, so don't account > > > > INVITEs that go through loose route logic. > > > > g-) > > > > > > > > inge wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > I've got a problem with call waiting function. This one allow us to hang > > > > > out a call when we are already in communication. > > > > > > > > > > But when I press "R" on my phone to take the second call, there is one > > > > > INVITE and one ACK generated by the proxy and being accounted in MySQL. > > > > > > > > > > It's the same when I switch between both callers. So I can have for the > > > > > same callid 2 3 4...X INVITE ACK and one BYE. So in SERWeb for example, > > > > > I can see for one call 3 lines of accounting. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for you support. > > > > > > > > > > Adrien .L > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Serusers mailing list > > > > > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >