-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER on port xxxx to SER on port 5060 Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:56:50 +0200 From: Aldo Armiento aldo@cerca.com Organization: Cerca.com s.r.l. To: daniel@iptel.org References: 40E34AFC.40309@armiento.com 40E3C3E1.6010300@iptel.org
Dear Daniel, ok, i known "port" in global config. My question is: how can I tell (routing rules) to "fake" ser at port 5090 to work as "proxy" for "real" ser at port 5060?
UA(1) --> NAT --> SER (5090) --> SER (5060) --> NAT --> UA(2) | |--> this NAT currupts packets to port 5060 (!!) so I have to use another port but I want other "normal" UA (with or without a good nat) work on port 5060.
Thanks you!!
Aldo.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello, use port=5090 in your ser.cfg config file -- in global configuration parameters section.
Daniel
On 7/1/2004 1:21 AM, Aldo Armiento wrote:
Hi all! Some my sip clients are behind a nat on an internet public network that "corrupt" UDP packect (wrong checksum) if is directed to port 5060. Is possible to have a SER on port (for example) 5090 as a "proxy" for the real ser on port 5060? How I have to configure ser.cfg for "fake" ser on port 5090?
Thanks you, Aldo.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers