Because the history of this module is with the userspace rtpproxy and because it aims to be (mostly) compatible with the rtpproxy module in terms of how it's engaged.
š
--
SentšfromšmyšBlackBerry.šPleasešexcusešerrorsšandšbrevity.
SentšfromšmyšBlackBerry.šPleasešexcusešerrorsšandšbrevity.
From: Kalala Alexander Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 7:58 AM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Reply To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] RTPengine |
š
Why, then, documentation writing about this flag "force"?
š
19.01.2015, 15:54, "Alex Balashov" <abalashov@evaristesys.com>:
,Correct. Not supported.š--
SentšfromšmyšBlackBerry.šPleasešexcusešerrorsšandšbrevity.
Have a question modulo rtpengine.šFunction rtpengine_offer ([flags]):It is not clear, this flag "force" does not work in this module?
forceš- instructs thešRTPšproxy to ignore marks inserted by anotheršRTPšproxy in transit to indicate that the session is already goes through another proxy. Allows creating a chain of proxies. Not supported and ignored by Sipwise rtpengine.
š--
ó Õ×ÁÖÅÎÉÅÍéÎÖÅÎÅÒ ÐÏ ÔÅÌÅËÏÍÍÕÎÉËÁÃÉÑÍšëÁÌÁÌÁ áÌÅËÓÁÎÄÒšvel: 375291146285life: 375256819996skype: klistrodšVoIP Network Engineer
dCAP, CCNAVoice
Kalala Alexanderšš_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
š
š
--
ó Õ×ÁÖÅÎÉÅÍ
ó Õ×ÁÖÅÎÉÅÍ
éÎÖÅÎÅÒ ÐÏ ÔÅÌÅËÏÍÍÕÎÉËÁÃÉÑÍš
ëÁÌÁÌÁ áÌÅËÓÁÎÄÒš
vel: 375291146285
life: 375256819996
skype: klistrod
š
VoIP Network Engineer
dCAP, CCNAVoice
Kalala Alexander
dCAP, CCNAVoice
Kalala Alexander
š
š
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users