21 Feb
2014
21 Feb
'14
2 a.m.
Hi Francesco,
o Carsten Bock on 02/21/2014 12:05 AM:
Hi Francesco,
Yes, SEMS is well maintained (i don't know, how well the website is
maintained).
You find the souce-code here:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sems;a=summary
Carsten is right that
SEMS is maintained, but it's website not really
well (the ftp server is down, thanks for letting us know, will be up
soon)...
To start with SEMS sbc, have a look at the sbc module documentation:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sems;a=blob;f=doc/Readme.sbc…
You'll need to define some regex mappings to have the calls and other
messages from different origins (e.g. different received interfaces,
then from different remote IPs/trunks) processed with the right SBC
profiles. Then in the profiles you define what should happen with that
calls and where they are sent. For registrations / calls to
registrations use the enable_reg_caching option; for NAT handling use
dlg_nat_handling=yes, enable_rtprelay=yes,
rtprelay_force_symmetric_rtp=yes, and set the interfaces used for RTP
in rtprelay_interface/aleg_rtprelay_interface.
Using git master is recommended.
hth
Stefan
Kind regards,
Carsten
Am 20.02.2014 23:55 schrieb "Francesco Maria Magnini"
<fmm1982(a)gmail.com <mailto:fmm1982@gmail.com>>:
@Carsten
I looked at http://www.iptel.org/sems and seems to be only broken
links to downloads.
Do you know if the project is still maintained?
@Fred
Are you using openser as a B2BUA?
Il giorno 20/feb/2014, alle ore 19:42, Fred Posner
<fred(a)palner.com <mailto:fred@palner.com>> ha scritto:
Alex's article is one of my favorites. That
being said, we
switched out an Acme SBC for openser (at the time) and was
immediately thrilled.
Fred Posner
The Palner Group, Inc.
503-914-0999 (direct)
954-472-2896 (fax)
On 02/20/2014 01:14 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Francesco,
>
> Have a look at this blog post:
>
>
http://www.likewise.am/2013/03/kamailio-as-an-sbc-session-border-controller/
>
>
> That said, I agree with Carsten's suggestion of SEMS.
>
> On 02/20/2014 11:04 AM, Francesco Maria Magnini wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to have some suggestions about a full replacement
of an
>> ACME Packet Net-Net Session Border
Controller.
>> By now, ACME SBC performs all the SBC functionalities, mainly:
>>
>> - it is used as a SIP endpoint for SIP client registrations
>> - it is used as a SIP endpoint for interconnection to multiple SIP
>> carriers via SIP trunks
>> - it is used for NAT traversal
>>
>> In this deployment, the SIP Server communicates only with the
SBC and
>> this one takes care of the communication
between the SIP
Server and
>> the external SIP entities (UA clients,
SIP Trunks).
>> In this scenario, can I consider to replace the SBC with Kamailio?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing
list
>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users