2 Oct
2007
2 Oct
'07
7:30 p.m.
El Friday 14 September 2007 13:17:09 Klaus Darilion escribió:
Juha Heinanen schrieb:
I think "Route" header should be canonical hostname and not the SIP domain:
In "SIP Forum"'s SIPconnect program to get SIP compliant devices and
services
we can read:
"SIP Proxy Servers MUST use canonical hostnames in any 'Via:' and/or
'Route:'
SIP header field that it inserts in the SIP message.":
http://www.zoomerang.com/web/SharedResults/SharedResultsSurveyResultsPage.a…
(step 15)
So if that is true then OpenSer behaviour is correct and there is a bug in
oSIP stack because it shouldn't add a "Route" header with SIP domain value
in
REGISTER messages. Could anyone confirm this in order to report the bug to
oSIP developers?
--
ilimit...
*Iñaki Baz Castillo*
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
ÀREA SISTEMES
0034 937 333 375
VOLTA 1, PIS 5
08224 TERRASSA.BCN
Aquest enviament és confidencial i està destinat únicament a la persona a qui
s'ha enviat.
Pot contenir informació privada sotmesa al secret professional, la distribució
de la qual està prohibida per la legislació vigent.
Klaus Darilion writes:
You are correct but IMO it is still legal. Are you sure? I think
INVITE sip:klaus@iptel.org SIP/2.0
Route: <sip:iptel.org;lr>
that kind of route header uri does not provide any added value to request
uri.