That means nathelper was trying to change SDP but there was no SDP in the reply. I guess it complains because 200 OK to BYE doesn't have any body. If you want to get rid of the message then do not call t_on_reply("1") for BYE transactions.
Jan.
On 12-01 15:46, Darren Nay wrote:
Hey All,
I am using Ser CVS stable release. Downloaded yesterday.
I am getting the following errors after disconnecting from outgoing calls. The calls are going through okay, but I always get this error on the console and in syslog upon disconnection of the call. By outgoing calls I mean from calls from a registered SIP phone to numbers outside our PSTN gateway. Incoming calls coming from outside the gateway to registered phone numbers are not giving these errors.
The error message are:
Jan 12 17:25:21 tequila /usr/local/sbin/ser[16801]: [ID 272711 daemon.error] ERROR: extract_body: message body has lenght zero Jan 12 17:25:21 tequila /usr/local/sbin/ser[16801]: [ID 833947 daemon.error] ERROR: force_rtp_proxy: can't extract body from the message Jan 12 17:25:21 tequila /usr/local/sbin/ser[16801]: [ID 725830 daemon.error] ERROR: on_reply processing failed
Any ideas why I would get these messages? I've attached my ser.cfg file as well.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
Darren Nay - dnay@libertyisp.com
# # $Id: nathelper.cfg,v 1.1 2003/11/10 14:15:36 janakj Exp $ # # simple quick-start config script including nathelper support
# This default script includes nathelper support. To make it work # you will also have to install Maxim's RTP proxy. The proxy is enforced # if one of the parties is behind a NAT. # # If you have an endpoing in the public internet which is known to # support symmetric RTP (Cisco PSTN gateway or voicemail, for example), # then you don't have to force RTP proxy. If you don't want to enforce # RTP proxy for some destinations than simply use t_relay() instead of # route(1) # # Sections marked with !! Nathelper contain modifications for nathelper # # NOTE !! This config is EXPERIMENTAL ! # # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------
debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=yes log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E)
## Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode #fork=no #log_stderror=yes
check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
# ------------------ module loading ----------------------------------
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/acc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so"
# !! Nathelper loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so"
# ----------------- setting module-specific parameters ---------------
# -- usrloc params --
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)
# -- auth params -- modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") modparam("auth_db", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser")
# -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
# !! Nathelper modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) # Ping interval 30 s modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients behind NAT
# -- acc params -- modparam("acc", "log_level", 1) modparam("acc", "db_flag", 3) modparam("acc", "db_url","mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser")
# ------------------------- request routing logic -------------------
# main routing logic
route{
# initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests# if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { # sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); # break; # }; if (msg:len >= max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; };
# !! Nathelper # Special handling for NATed clients; first, NAT test is # executed: it looks for via!=received and RFC1918 addresses # in Contact (may fail if line-folding is used); also, # the received test should, if completed, should check all # vias for rpesence of received if (nat_uac_test("3")) { # Allow RR-ed requests, as these may indicate that # a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of it; unless it is # a REGISTER if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) { log("LOG: Someone trying to register from private IP, rewriting\n"); # This will work only for user agents that support symmetric # communication. We tested quite many of them and majority is # smart enough to be symmetric. In some phones it takes a configuration # option. With Cisco 7960, it is called NAT_Enable=Yes, with kphone it is # called "symmetric media" and "symmetric signalling". fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with source IP of signalling if (method == "INVITE") { fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add direction=active to SDP }; force_rport(); # Add rport parameter to topmost Via setflag(6); # Mark as NATed }; }; setflag(3); # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route(); # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the # path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (!uri==myself) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==myself) { if (method=="REGISTER") {# Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication # if (!www_authorize("iptel.org", "subscriber")) { # www_challenge("iptel.org", "0"); # break; # };
save("location"); break; }; lookup("aliases"); if (!uri==myself) { append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { if (uri=~"^sip:1.*") { rewritehostport("63.86.212.157:5060"); }; if (uri=~"^sip:011.*") { rewritehostport("65.200.155.26:5060"); }; route(1); break; }; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1);}
route[1] { # !! Nathelper if (uri=~"[@:](192.168.|10.|172.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1]).)" && !search("^Route:")){ sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP addresses"); break; };
# if client or server know to be behind a NAT, enable relay if (isflagset(6)) { force_rtp_proxy(); }; # NAT processing of replies; apply to all transactions (for example, # re-INVITEs from public to private UA are hard to identify as # NATed at the moment of request processing); look at replies t_on_reply("1"); # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP setflag(3); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); };}
# !! Nathelper onreply_route[1] { # NATed transaction ? if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") { fix_nated_contact();
force_rtp_proxy(); # otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and we did not # know at time of request processing ? (RFC1918 contacts) } else if (nat_uac_test("1")) { fix_nated_contact(); };}
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers