7 Aug
2014
7 Aug
'14
4:52 p.m.
Hi Daniel,
You did not invoke rtpproxy symmetrically on replies? Or just not sdpops?
On 7 August 2014 06:22:11 GMT-04:00, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
To conclude here, it should work if you call msg apply
changes, so the
sdp body is built again. I use this in a prototype deployment and seems
all going well. I did it only for requests, though.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 07/08/14 00:08, Alex Balashov wrote:
--
Sent from my mobile, and thus lacking in the refinement one might expect from a fully
fledged keyboard.
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0671
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com
Sorry, I didn't see the previous thread about
this very issue. That
was a dumb post. The question arose entirely coincidentally.
On 08/06/2014 06:06 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it safe to use sdpops and the rtpproxy* modules together, given
that
> the latter modify SDP? In other words, can I
prune some codecs
first,
>> and then call rtpproxy_offer()? Is it safe?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>
>