Apologies for this guys. This was our mistake. Thanks Daniel for resolving. We will test the async replies in master today.

---
This mail was sent using my phone and may be brief, to the point, or contain typos
---

On 24 Oct 2013 08:17, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,

can you give a test to latest master branch? I pushed a patch there.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 10/24/13 7:39 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,

On 10/23/13 8:31 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
in the test where reply is not relayed, i set flag 16:

     setflag(16);

then see this:

msg_parser.h:#define FL_RPL_SUSPENDED     (1<<16)  /* for async reply processing */

could this explain what is happening?

i have always thought that message flags can be freely used in the
script.  is it now so that flag 16 is reserved for suspend/resume
feature?

if so, what other flags i'm not able to use in my script without
messing everything up?
Looks like a mistaken usage of the internal flags, FL_RPL_SUSPENDED being actually on the script flags. Script accessible flags should be always at the will of script writer.

I will look over it.

Cheers,
Daniel

-- juha

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28; Miami, Nov 18-20, 2013
  - more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -


_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
This email is subject to the disclaimer of Smile Communications at http://www.smilecoms.com/disclaimer