Thank you Daniel for your analyse. It’s strange, because there’s no NAT.
We force the RTPProxy in order to bypass routing issue in this call-flow, but both platform are reachable with public IP address.
I will look at the old SER and see why he does fix_nated_contact().
Regards,
Igor.
De : sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] De la part de Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Envoyé : mercredi 20 novembre 2013 22:37
À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Problem with loose_route for a BYE
On 11/20/13 6:10 PM, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. Indeed, I think that R-URI contains the kamailio address.
The old ser should not do fix_nated_contact() for traffic comming from kamailio. It is not in the position to figure out the address of the nat router. That is done by kamailio (which should use anyhow add_contact_alias(), because it is a better alternative for nat fixing).
Cheers,
Daniel
[...]
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28
- more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -
Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection Antivirus avast! est active. |