16 Feb
2005
16 Feb
'05
7:17 p.m.
Not yet, but we are close to stable status. So far no major flaws have
been discovered.
Jan.
On 16-02 09:07, Steve Blair wrote:
Jamey:
Has 0.9.0 moved to current stable status? I thought it was still
in that transition state.
Thanks,Steve
Matt Schulte wrote:
Ah k, I checked out the cvsroot of ser and
everything is dated months
ago. Is there something I'm missing? :-).. Also ser "stable" is still at
0.9.0 right?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jamey Hicks [mailto:jamey.hicks@hp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 7:47 AM
To: Matt Schulte
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..
Matt Schulte wrote:
--
ISC Network Engineering
The University of Pennsylvania
3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A
Philadelphia, PA 19104
voice: 215-573-8396
215-746-8001
fax: 215-898-9348
sip:blairs@upenn.edu
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers Is ser being actively developed anymore?
Everywhere I go on iptel's
website, everything is horridly outdated. Is there an alternative to
ser? We like ser a lot but don't want to continue inhouse devel on a
"dead" program. Asterisk doesn't even come close to the processing
power of ser, that can't be it... ??
Ser is still being actively developed. If you're doing in-house
development on ser, I suggest you join the serdev mailing list so that
you can keep up on what's going on with other ser developments.
Jamey
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers