Not yet, but we are close to stable status. So far no major flaws have been discovered.
Jan.
On 16-02 09:07, Steve Blair wrote:
Jamey:
Has 0.9.0 moved to current stable status? I thought it was still in that transition state.
Thanks,Steve
Matt Schulte wrote:
Ah k, I checked out the cvsroot of ser and everything is dated months ago. Is there something I'm missing? :-).. Also ser "stable" is still at 0.9.0 right?
-----Original Message----- From: Jamey Hicks [mailto:jamey.hicks@hp.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 7:47 AM To: Matt Schulte Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..
Matt Schulte wrote:
Is ser being actively developed anymore? Everywhere I go on iptel's website, everything is horridly outdated. Is there an alternative to ser? We like ser a lot but don't want to continue inhouse devel on a "dead" program. Asterisk doesn't even come close to the processing power of ser, that can't be it... ??
Ser is still being actively developed. If you're doing in-house development on ser, I suggest you join the serdev mailing list so that you can keep up on what's going on with other ser developments.
Jamey
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
ISC Network Engineering The University of Pennsylvania 3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A Philadelphia, PA 19104
voice: 215-573-8396
215-746-8001fax: 215-898-9348
sip:blairs@upenn.edu
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers