Re: [SR-Users] Next hop of reply, in onreply_route

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 09:09:50PM +0500, Arsen wrote:

What about handling Via header with selects?

Possible, just a bit too forensic. Wondered if there was a high-level PV I missed.

The way I am currently handling this problem is by setting an AVP with the transport on which the transaction-forming request was received, the figuring being that this allows me to process the reply as though it will be headed back down that same transport in the end.

But this, too, seems a little too high-coupled for my tastes. I need transaction data anyway, but otherwise prefer to operate as statelessly as possible; it's just a good principle of software engineering IMHO.

-- Alex