19 Jul
2004
19 Jul
'04
8:05 a.m.
Great!!
this actually worked. I've changed the port from 5060 to 5070 and now
authorization runs fine. Could anyone give a logical explanation for this?
thanks again Mike,
Bart
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Tkachuk [mailto:mike@yes.net.ua]
Sent: maandag 19 juli 2004 13:48
To: Bart Van Daal
Subject: Re[4]: [Serusers] NAT vs. NoNat authentication
Hello Bart,
Monday, July 19, 2004, 2:27:21 PM, you wrote:
BVD> Hi Mike,
BVD> thanks for the answer and the tip..
BVD> I can see the sipserver sending multiple '401' to the
router, so I
BVD> guess the router just drops these packets because it
doesn't know
BVD> what to do with them? I now have put the UA in dmz but
that still
BVD> doesn't solve the problem. I'll look further.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Tkachuk [mailto:mike@yes.net.ua]
> Sent: maandag 19 juli 2004 11:56
> To: Bart Van Daal
> Subject: Re[2]: [Serusers] NAT vs. NoNat authentication
>
>
>
> Hello Bart,
>
> Looks like UA not receiving 401 unauthorized message from
SER, that's
> why it not resend REGISTER message with
calculated digest.
> Maybe you have some troubles with NAT on 213.219.137.148?
>
> Hint: use ngrep with -W byline option (eg: ngrep -W byline
port 5060
> )
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,.
> Mike Tkachuk, ph:380-3433-47067
> YES ISP, fx:380-3433-47067
> Valova 17, mike|a|yes.net.ua
> Kolomyia, www.yes.net.ua
> Ukraine 78200 FWD: 66518
>
> 19.07.2004
> ICQ# 57698805
> MSN: mike_tkachuk|a|hotmail.com
> ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,.
>
One thing... some routers think that they are very smart :),
so try to change port on SER from 5060 to some other ( like:
port=5070 ) most of routers can be fooled with it.
--
Best regards,
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,.
Mike Tkachuk, ph:380-3433-47067
YES ISP, fx:380-3433-47067
Valova 17, mike|a|yes.net.ua
Kolomyia, www.yes.net.ua
Ukraine 78200 FWD: 66518
19.07.2004
ICQ# 57698805
MSN: mike_tkachuk|a|hotmail.com
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,.