Re: [SR-Users] force_rtp_proxy/rtpproxy_offer/answer not replacing ip addr.

Hi Ovidiu, Thanks for the info. But why the command still available in the doc. http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules_k/rtpproxy.html#id30241… anyway i will try the trunk version. but may i know which version? is this ok? # svn co http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/openser/branches/1.5 kamailio Thanks in advance. Cheers, MingHon On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Ovidiu Sas <osas(a)voipembedded.com> wrote: > > Can you try the trunk version? > I remember fixing a bug related to the external IP, but I don't > remember if it is available on a stable version. > > Regards, > Ovidiu sas > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:16 AM, MingHon <gminghon(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Carsten, > > I tried RTPProxy using external address. It work out from the box > > without > > any problem. > > UA successfully registered and RTP-Traffic relay work. > > Yup but now im trying to put the Box behind the nat. > > i refer to this > > > > thread http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2011-June/069223.html > > im able to put rtpproxy behind nat but need to modify the SDP body put > > in > > the proper ip address. > > so im trying to use force_rtp_proxy("co","external-address"); to modify > > the > > (c=) and (o=) in SDP body. > > but in the SDP body i didnt see any changes of the ip address i tried > > adding > > several flags f,r,w but no luck. > > if i double my line  "force_rtp_proxy("co","external-address");" > > in my SDP body i will get double private ip (c=192.168.1.3192.168.1.3) > > and > > (o=192.168.1.3192.168.1.3) > > thanks in advance, > > -- > > Regards, > > > > MingHon > >