7 Oct
2009
7 Oct
'09
4:30 p.m.
2009/10/7 Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com>om>:
inaki,
interesting reading. i haven't been on ietf mailing lists for quite
some time. perhaps there are no "ietf" people anymore left in ietf sip
related working groups, and they are currently only rubber stamping
oma/ims specifications. looks to be that way, because no-one responded
to your message.
i don't have anything against oma as long as they don't force me to use
a large number of walled garden servers (like is the case with ims),
whose only purpose is to milk the cow as many times as possible.
perhaps it thus makes sense to adopt from oma specs at least the xml
document specifications.
That's exactly my point Juha.
I would stop reading OMA specs right now if I suspect they are
designed for a closed/vendor/operator environment :)
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>