[Serusers] 2nd Instance of SER for SEMS startup

Hello: I have a second instance of SER running on the same box as the first instance. The first instance is our proxy server the second exists only to integrate SEMS with the failure_route block. It seems that each instance of SER and possibly SEMS too must be started in a specific sequence. Has anyone looked into this? What I'm seeing is that if the 2nd instance of SER is started first then administrators using serctl experience problems accessing certain functions. Specifically I am seeing a 'ul_dump' does not exist error when issuing the serctl ul show command. If I start the 1st instance (proxy) of SER first I do not get this error. Thinking this was due to missing loadmodules in the 2nd config file I copied the loadmodule statements from the 1st config file to the 2nd. I no longer have issues with serctl regardless of the startup sequence but now calls that use to fail over to SEMS are getting a fast busy. Am I missing something about the startup sequence of 2 instances of SER ? Thanks,Steve -- ISC Network Engineering The University of Pennsylvania 3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A Philadelphia, PA 19104 voice: 215-573-8396 215-746-7903 fax: 215-898-9348 sip:blairs@upenn.edu