On 4/30/15 7:35 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 04/30/2015 07:31 AM, Andres wrote:
I am inclined to believe this is perfectly normal and compliant but let me know what you think.
Yep, it's normal. Moreover, only the RURI value should be used for routing purposes or for anything else that's consequential in relation to the destination; the "To" header has purely cosmetic meaning, as a statement about the logical intended destination.
Wait a minute...so if the To header is mainly 'cosmetic', how are we to differentiate incoming calls for 400 DIDs if the uri is always the same (the username of the trunk), but the To header has the actual DID number? I was under the impression that sure, the uri is responsible for routing across the network, but once it reaches the final destination hop (ie the PBX), the To header would kick in to actually know where to send the call.
Thanks,