3 Feb
2010
3 Feb
'10
4:22 p.m.
El Miércoles, 3 de Febrero de 2010, Alex Balashov escribió:
What about using add_rr_param() to indicate NAT
somehow so that this
flag can be fished later out of the Record-Route header / Route set on
sequential requests and replies?
This is exactly what I use to determine if rtpproxy must be added for a re-
INVITE and its response (I add ";rtpproxy=yes" in Record-Route of the initial
INVITE).
However this trick is not needed at all to fix just the signalling as the
"Contact" URI (so the dialog target uri) was already replaced in the initial
INVITE/200, and it cannot change within a dialog.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>