29 Apr
2009
29 Apr
'09
5:41 p.m.
Hello,
On 04/29/2009 03:03 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
Hi,
unfortunately the changes between the 1.3 and 1.4 Version only affect
documentation...
Since the differences between dialog/dlg_request_within.c are also not
worth mentioning, i believe, the error lies somewhere in tm-module or
even in the core of 1.3.
it is changed/restored using the data lump system. I will check although
I do not remember big changes in the past, but 1.3 is quite old by now,
so my memory can fail...
Cheers,
Daniel
Carsten
Am Donnerstag, den 23.04.2009, 18:54 +0200 schrieb Daniel-Constantin
Mierla:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/
Hello,
have you tried to trace major changes between 1.3 and 1.4versions in
uac/from.c?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 04/23/2009 11:55 AM, Carsten Bock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this only happens, when the replacement-From-Header is shorter than the
> existing one. The number of "\0" represents the number of characters
> removed from the request.
> Also, i forgot to mention one other, important issue: This happens only,
> if we terminate the call using the dialog-module... in all other cases
> this is fine.
> It also seems, that this only occurs in the old 1.3 release, in 1.4 this
> looks ok.
>
> Carsten
>
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2009, 21:55 +0200 schrieb Daniel-Constantin
> Mierla:
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 04/22/2009 06:26 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> short question:
>>> I've noticed, when the UAC-Module (from 1.3) replaces the From-Headerin
>>> subsequential requests, the From-Header is filled up with "zeros".
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> this is strange. How many zeros -- is there a relation between original
>> size and number of zeros? Does it happen in all cases?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>>> For most clients this is absolutely fine (tested with Snom's, AVM's,
>>> Cisco's and many more). I've noticed, that some Zyxel devices however
do
>>> not like this and ignore the request in this case...
>>> Is this somehow defined in the RFC? Can somebody give me hint on a
>>> chapter or something? Or does it break the RFC?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> Carsten
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
>>> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
>>> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>> http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users