25 Mar
2013
25 Mar
'13
1:54 p.m.
Hello,
On 3/15/13 11:32 AM, Efelin Novak wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to ask you whether it is a good idea to acknowledge a BYE
message in advance using t_reply("200", "OK") on my border proxy.
Not
acknowledged BYE messages by clients cause me problems in the middle
of my network.
Is there any problem with this behavior from Kamailio side, from
script side or from SIP side? Do you have any experience with such
logic manipulation? I am aware that this is not a proxy function, but
it would solve many problems.
if it solves your problems and do not bring other,
then you are set, go
for it. This is one of the benefits using open source and open
configuration files (in other terms open boxes vs black boxes).
My script is as follows:
if (loose_route()) {
if (is_method("BYE")) {
setflag(1); # do accounting ...
t_newtran();
t_reply("200", "OK");
}
route(RELAY);
}
My test shows that 200 OK from client are absorbed. Also if there is
no reply from a client, Kamailio does not generate 408 Request
Timeout.
Do you want the 408 to be generated?
Do you need the local generated 200 ok for own accounting or for the
sender of the BYE?
Cheers,
Daniel
I'm using older version kamailio 3.1.0 (i386/linux) 21a375.
Thanks for an advice
Efelin
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, April 16-17, 2013, Berlin
- http://conference.kamailio.com -