On 9/2/05, jeff kwong <kwongfucius@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Waldo,

I didn't do anything else outside the instructions as in the Getting Started Manual from Onsip.org for the SER with MySQL and connecting to a PSTN gateway.I also got the config from there. I also got a good set of tips for that in my previous posts here. As for the Siproxd, I just followed the online docs here: http://siproxd.sourceforge.net/ .

On 9/2/05, Waldo Rubinstein < waldo@trianet.net> wrote:
Wouldn't mind learning from your accomplishments. How about sharing
some how-tos and/or config files?

Would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Waldo

On Sep 2, 2005, at 12:58 AM, jeff kwong wrote:

> Hi Guys!
>
> I just would like to share that I was able to get a working setup
> using SER as Softswitch, Asterisk as PSTN gateway and SIPROXD on my
> NAT Router. SIPROXD is an open source ALG and it effectively
> handles sip nat traversals. With it I dont have to run a seperate
> mediaproxy. When making calls from SIP UA to PSTN, RTP is as below:
>
> UA---NAT/SIPROXD---ASTERISK
>
> for 2 UA behind the same NAT:
>
> UA1--NAT---UA2
>
> and for 2 UA behind different NATs:
>
> UA1--NAT1----NAT2---UA2
>
> Thus there is less latency on signals and less traffic on SER. My
> question is, from the experience of other guys here, what do you
> think is the drawback or advantages of using SIPROXD together with
> SER to solve SIP NAT issues compared to other methods like using
> mediaproxy and rtpproxy?Will I still be able to do other SER
> features like accounting?
>
>
> Thanks!
> _jeff
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers@iptel.org
> http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>

_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers