On 14/04/14 15:11, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
could that
function be used as a model to re-sync also other transaction
attributes?
If someone needs something similar, of course new functions can be
added. Anything particular in mind?
Daniel
on the other hand, we have been discussing here branch attributes, which
may be a separate issue. as i have mentioned earlier, attributes in
branch-failure route should be identical to the corresponding branch
route. anything else makes no sense to me.
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda