2013/5/23 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
First a general recommendation: try to avoid patching
core that much for
non-common use cases.
Sure. I was just trying to see how this could be done. I don't want to
mess with the core. :-)
[snip]
At this moment, I think a good solution could be:
[snip]
- update the interpreter to use pv cache instead of
own spec per pv (I can
do it, being in my list and hopefully is no big change)
I will try to do it myself just to get familliar with this area. Let's
see how it goes.
- if this feature is enabled in debugger module, it
will create a hash table
where to index pv set functions by pointer and point to the cache item
- this index has to be created in child_init with rank PROC_INIT to be sure
all pvs were resolved to cache item
Sorry. But I don't get this. Can you, please, explain me the rationale
behind this hash table?.
Thank you for your help!
Cheers,
Victor