26 Sep
2007
26 Sep
'07
5:15 p.m.
On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Carsten Bock wrote:
Hi Henning,
Now everything seems to become clear about the usage of the carrierroute
module. Now i seem to understand, how the carrier-route module should
work.
You wrote:
For
"if(!cr_rewrite_uri("0", "call_id")){"
the default-tree would be used (e.g. carrier1).
If i change this to
"if(!cr_tree_rewrite_uri("carrier2", "0")){"
would the tree of "carrier2" be used? I assume (when looking at the
source), i cannot use pseudo-variables here..., right?
Yes, carrier2 would be used in this case.
PVs are not implemented for tree_rewrite at the moment. We don't needed this,
as we're lookup the carrier from the database. You probably already noticed
the user_route_uri function that use AVPs, so should be not so hard to
implement. Patches are of course always welcome :-).
Cheers,
Henning