Re: [Serusers] reply to port 5060

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 09:46:39PM +0300, David Lubarski wrote: While I don't quite understand the purpose of this restriction, it may well be that Checkpoint does have it. As I said I don't know Checkpoint... If so, anyway, you should configure your client to send its requests _from_ port 5060 then. Then SER will of course reply to port 5060, too. I don't see any other solution that could work, if Checkpoints really works the way you describe. Besides, I should have checked in depth before stating that it's possible in SER to override the port for the reply. It's not. You can override the port for requests, but not for replies. (And I guess this is so for a good reason.:-) Regards, Jan -- Jan Andres <jan.andres(a)freenet-ag.de>