30 Mar
2010
30 Mar
'10
9:06 p.m.
On 3/30/10 7:27 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 03/30/2010 01:17 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
it is harmless, since it does update to contact header, the changes are
visible only when forwarding.
No, r-uri is the contact address from REGISTER.
Hmm. I guess I have been doing it wrong for a long time on 1.x by
using fix_nated_contact() on REGISTER processing where NAT is detected, Otherwise, how do you get far-end NAT traversal
for incoming calls (to
the registrants) to work?
dst_uri field is set to received ip:port, so the nat box is used as
outbound proxy. instead of fix_nated_register() and separation into
contact and
received as you describe. But in my case it works...
for natted cases the important thing is to get in location the ip and
port of nat box. then depends on sip phone how it accepts incoming requests.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla * http://www.asipto.com/ *
http://twitter.com/miconda *
http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielconstantinmierla