2 May
2006
2 May
'06
1:34 p.m.
I take a look into the log and it seems, that NOTIFY requests try to be
sent to 192.168.2.17.
But in the ngrep dump I see only some 85.105.102.167 addresses in
Contacts in SUBSCRIBE requests. Are you sure, that these log and the
flow belong to the same scenario?
If yes, it means, that there is a bug in PA module.
Be sure to catch messages on machine with presence server.
Vaclav
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:14:37PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
Hi,
I've captured debug logs by suggestion of Mr. Michal Matyska.
Attached I'm sending them to you. I hope it reaches you.
Please look for the "no socket found" and "Can't send watcherinfo
notification " lines in the log as it's too long.
Thanks,
ilker
-----Original Message-----
From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:28 PM
To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
You don't need anything else. Are you sure that changed config is used by ser (you
can try to add a mistake there, if SER will complain in startup or not)?
Vaclav
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:24:59PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
Hi,
I changed it to "debug=4" and restarted ser but nothing changed.
Is there anything missing in my configuration ? Do I need a seperate module for debug
messages ?
Thanks,
ilker
-----Original Message-----
From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:15 PM
To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
Hi,
debug=4 should be enough. And if you restart ser with this debug level, there should be
really lots of messages in the log.
If you have another proxy doing NAT it is probably not needed to do it on presence server
(and if oter messages work like MESSAGE).
Vaclav
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:39:01AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
<http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/03090704/07004405/00024C03/10101258.jpg>
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta
mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli
dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz
ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi
bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji
viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta
mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini
garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez.
This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from
making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please
notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and
destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any
reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of
computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms
of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any
occurrence.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Hi,
Which level of debug should I use ?
debug= ? (I tried debug=7 but nothing changed)
Btw, my clients are behind NAT. But I already forward them to an RTP+SIP proxy for voice
communication. And there is no rpoblem with voice.
Should I use any nathelper configuration for presence messages ?
Thanks,
ilker
-----Original Message-----
From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 11:23 AM
To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
I think, that this problem is not caused by absence of unixsock or unconfigured fifo
module.
Have you restarted ser after changing debug level (debug=xxx in cfg)?
There should be lots of messages.
Vaclav
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:49:22AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you think that I need unixsock module ?
> Also, do I need any configuration for fifo module ?
>
> I'm now using the CVS version and with full configuration in the presence
handbook.
> Everything seems to work except presence messages.
>
> After increasing the loglevel to 7 there is no more information in the log.
> Only these lines:
>
> May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket
> found May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: ERROR:
> notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 2
> 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: send_winfo_notify
> returned -7 May 2
> 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18649]: t_uac: no socket found
> May
> 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket
> found
>
> If it would help , I can send you my full configuration.
> I need help desperately.
>
> Regards,
> ilker
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:09 AM
> To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
>
> Hi,
> as I can see from the dump - MESSAGEs go through without problems, right?
> Try to increase debug level in config file, might be, you will see more.
> I don't see any problems... :-(
>
> Vaclav
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:32:24PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> > Hi Vaclav,
> >
> > I've installed ngrep and sending you ngrep output.
> >
> > "t_uac: no socket found" error is occuring in nearly all of the
events.
> > Should I use unixsock module ? If yes, what are the needed parameters ?
> > Currently fifo module is loaded. Should I use it also ?
> >
> > For problem 2 ; you are right. I am using Eyebeam. Then I'll ignore this
error.
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
> >
> > ilker