Hello Ihor,
Thanks for the reply!
Den mån 14 aug. 2023 kl 10:49 skrev Ihor Olkhovskyi <igorolhovskiy(a)gmail.com
:
Hello,
I'm having somewhat looks-alike problem with long responce from endpoints
and ended up tracking status of transaction (or dialog) htabled with
callerid key.
So, when I'm receiving an "outdated" responce, I'm checking the status
of
the whole transaction (or dialog) and acting accordingly.
Hopefuly, this idea can point you to solution.
I am a bit new to kamailio so I would like you to elaborate a bit if you
are able to do so.
Thanks!
/Mattis
Cheers,
Ihor
Le ven. 11 août 2023 à 22:32, Henning Westerholt <hw(a)gilawa.com> a écrit :
Hello,
this sounds odd. Are you maybe using a failure route to intercept the 503
and send the INVITE to a new destination?
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt –
https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services –
https://gilawa.com
*From:* Mattis Lind <mattislind(a)gmail.com>
*Sent:* Donnerstag, 10. August 2023 15:02
*To:* sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
*Subject:* [SR-Users] Kamailio dns-failover / dns-loadbalancing with
slow responding client.
Hello!
I am looking into a problem where we have Kamailio forwarding calls to
two or more "recording-clients". I will try my best to describe the
problem and would appreciate it if someone has an idea what to do. Please
feel free to ask if you think I have forgotten to describe something that
might be important or something is unclear in what I have written.
We use use_dns_failover=yes and dns_srv_lb=yes so calls get load
balancing to the "recording-clients". There is also the
t_set_fr(60000,1000) parameter set so that if there is no response within 1
second it would try the next recording-client. The SRV record points to two
or more recording clients.
It now happens that the recording-clients sometimes have some kind of
temporary problem so it will respond with a 503 after 5 seconds.
What happens is that after the 1 second timeout trying to get the INVITE
through to the first recording-client Kamailio will internally generate a
408. This will cause it to failover to another recording-client which
happily takes care of the INVITE and responds properly with a 200 OK.
Everything would have been just fine except for the fact that the first
recording-client is just slow and finally responds with a 503. This 503 is
not relayed backwards since a 200 has already been forwarded back to the
caller. But when receiving the 503 Kamailio will initiate a new INVITE
which is trying to set up a new call to a recording client. It looks like
it is doing a new failover regardless if it already has done a failover for
this failed transaction.
I don't want Kamailio to send that last INVITE when receiving the 503.
How can I configure Kamailio to disregard the last 503 (except for
responding with an ACK) and not initiate a new INVITE?
I have tried a lot of different changes to the configuration but failed
to achieve this, unfortunately. Do I need to use the dispatcher module to
achieve this?
/Mattis
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to
the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
--
Best regards,
Ihor (Igor)
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to
the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: