23 Nov
2010
23 Nov
'10
8:18 p.m.
2010/11/23 Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>om>:
I expect Kamailio just matches the Via branch, and not the Totag, am I wrong?
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
Really ugly.
Actually those CANCEL's are being rejected by my
kamailio (403) as they contain Totag but no Route header.
Are you saying that if not for this security check, Kamailio would match the
CANCELs to the INVITE transaction to which they are intended to correspond?
This should not happen; in order for CANCELs to be matched, they must have
the same attributes, tag-wise, as the initial INVITE to which they
correspond.