24 Apr
2020
24 Apr
'20
9:49 p.m.
Yes,
I did read all(past 3+ years) his replies specific to DMQ and DMQ USRLOC
and only one matched exact description and there has no resolution to it.
Github open+closed issues for DMQ didn't have anything similar either.
Could it be something I'm doing wrong !?
Additional info: One of the server is direct on Public IP and Other one is
behind NAT. Another test setup where it consistently reproducible is two
server behind NAT(AWS)
Here are the mod params. Only usrloc sync is done via DMQ and no other
module is using DMQ.
listen=udp:LocalIP:5060 advertise PublicIP:5060
modparam("dmq","server_address", DMQ_LOCAL_SERVER)
modparam("dmq", "notification_address", DMQ_REMOTE_SERVER)
modparam("dmq", "multi_notify", 0) //1 for DNS SRV
modparam("dmq", "num_workers", 10)
modparam("dmq", "ping_interval", 60)
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "enable", 1)
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "sync", 1)
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_size", 4000)
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_usleep", 1000)
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "usrloc_domain", "location")
Where: DMQ_REMOTE_SERVER = sip:PublicIP2:5060
GDB info as requested:
Core was generated by `/usr/local/sbin/kamailio -w /tmp/kamailio -P
/var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x00007f248c4cef15 in send_reply (msg=0x7f2469f88d40, code=0,
reason=0x7ffd775e3ab8) at sl.c:276
276 if(reason->s[reason->len-1]=='\0') {
(gdb)
(gdb)
(gdb) frame 0
#0 0x00007f248c4cef15 in send_reply (msg=0x7f2469f88d40, code=0,
reason=0x7ffd775e3ab8) at sl.c:276
276 if(reason->s[reason->len-1]=='\0') {
(gdb) p *reason
$1 = {s = 0x0, len = 0}
(gdb)
(gdb) frame 1
#1 0x00007f24656c6549 in worker_loop (id=2) at worker.c:129
129 if(slb.freply(current_job->msg,
peer_response.resp_code,
(gdb) p *worker
$3 = {queue = 0x7f2469f240a8, jobs_processed = 5, lock = {val = 2}, pid =
935}
(gdb)
(gdb)
(gdb) p *current_job
$6 = {f = 0x7f24656d6d8d <empty_peer_callback>, msg = 0x7f2469f88d40,
orig_peer = 0x7f2469f6ed50, next = 0x0, prev = 0x0}
(gdb)
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 1:30 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
have you tried the suggestion from Charles in the other response? It can
help figuring out where the problem resides.
Now, from C point of view, I would need the following output from gdb of
the core file:
frame 0
p *reason
frame 1
p *worker
p *current_job
I would also need to know the modparams for dmq and other dmq_* module,
plus the list if modules for which you enabled dmq (eg, htable, dialog,
presence, ...).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 24.04.20 18:10, SamyGo wrote:
Oops,apologize, missed that:
version: kamailio 5.3.3 (x86_64/linux) 44ccb9-dirty
flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS,
DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC,
F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT,
USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST,
HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024,
BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: 44ccb9 -dirty
compiled on 17:04:55 Apr 17 2020 with gcc 4.9.2
Tried this with version 5.0, 5.2, and now 5.3 same situation..
Thankyou for looking into this,
Sammy
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 2:33 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
you have to provide the version of kamailio for each reported kamailio
issue, otherwise is hard to match with the source code. Use 'kamailio -v'
to get version details.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 23.04.20 23:36, SamyGo wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to broadcast KDMQ to the cluster but not expect a reply
back !?as far as I've read the source code dmq_bcast_message is exactly
like dmq_send_message in a way that it expects a callback to be executed on
response i.e expects a reply.
So, the situation I'm facing is I'm broadcasting message to cluster and I
do not want a reply back. The following two options result in crash & core
dump.
1 - If my script doesn't respond back, by use of dmq_handle_message, it
marks the destined servers as "inactive" and stops usrloc sync process
which isn't desirable.
2 - If I respond back with the dmq_handle_message it crashes the Kamailio
which just received this broadcasted message.
Here is how its done in script:
*broadcasting message to cluster:*
dmq_bcast_message("userOnline", "$fu",
"text/plain");
*Receiving and handling a broadcast message:*
route[DMQ_HANDLE] {
if(!(is_method("KDMQ") || $rm == "KDMQ")) return;
if(is_method("KDMQ") || $rm == "KDMQ"){
if($rU =~ "userOnline"){
//user came online in cluster, resume transactions
if-any suspended
$avp(remoteUser) = $rb;
}
dmq_handle_message();
exit;
}
}
*Related log lines:*
Apr 23 21:15:48 kamailio[916]: ALERT: <script>: [da2c1-2f499] ------
DMQ_HANDLE: UserOnline Event Received ------
Apr 23 21:15:48 kamailio[916]: DEBUG: dmq [message.c:53]:
ki_dmq_handle_message_rc(): dmq_handle_message [KDMQ
sip:userOnline@9.8.7.123:5060]
Apr 23 21:15:48 kamailio[916]: DEBUG: dmq [message.c:66]:
ki_dmq_handle_message_rc(): dmq_handle_message peer found: userOnline
Apr 23 21:15:48 kamailio[916]: DEBUG: <core> [core/receive.c:437]:
receive_msg(): request-route executed in: 401461 usec
Apr 23 21:15:48 kamailio[935]: DEBUG: dmq [worker.c:87]: worker_loop():
dmq_worker [2 935] lock acquired
and crash/segfault..
Core dump: https://pastebin.com/S7ekCPfF
Any help or pointers to solve this would be really appreciated.
Best Regards,
Sammy
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda