Hi Vaclav,

Did you have time to check usrloc for db support ?

Thanks,
ilker

-----Original Message-----
From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 12:57 PM
To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Cc: samuel; serusers@iptel.org
Subject: Re: Authorizing IM requests

The file format is different! You really CAN NOT set these rules from EyeBeam. The filename is given as parameter to authorize_message function (in CVS version; not snapshot).

If you need it quickly you really have to correct it somewhere in sources (I don't know where).

        Vaclav
       
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:52:42AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> Hi Vaclav,
>
> On which file does Ser look for when authorizing messages ?
> According to that maybe I can link privacy-lists file to im-rules file
> (which Ser looks for) Would that work ?
>
> Usrloc problem is very important for me. Please tell me anything I can
> do to find out the problem (if there is anything that I can do)
>
> Thanks,
> ilker
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 9:29 AM
> To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> Cc: samuel; serusers@iptel.org
> Subject: Re: Authorizing IM requests
>
> Hi,
> yes I did, but I had forgotten...
>
> You can NOT use EyeBeam to work with message authorization - it will NEVER set the rules which are needed by SER. You can do this only manually on XCAP server.
>
> I try to look on the userloc problem, but don't know when.
>
>         Vaclav
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 05:29:27PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> > Hi Vaclav,
> >
> > Did you receive my following email ?
> >
> > Btw, I still couldn't find the neccessary db structure for using
> > usrloc with db support. Can you point me to the right person who
> > knows the required db structure ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > ilker
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> > Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 12:52 PM
> > To: 'Vaclav Kubart'
> > Cc: samuel; serusers@iptel.org
> > Subject: RE: Authorizing IM requests
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, then what can I use in the following line to authorize IM messages ?
> >
> > if (authorize_message("https://sip.koc.net/xcap")) {
> >
> > Eyebeam updates file /xcap/privacy-lists/user/privacy-lists.xml when I change the "privacy" configuration on Eyebeam client.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > ilker
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
> > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:48 PM
> > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> > Cc: samuel; serusers@iptel.org
> > Subject: Re: Authorizing IM requests
> >
> > Yes, I meant, that this will not work together.
> >
> > I don't know. Privacy-lists are something eyeBeam's internal or something standardized?
> >
> > Im-rules are SER internal.
> >
> >         Vaclav
> >      
> > On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 04:43:35PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> > > Do you mean it won't work with privacy-lists ?
> > > What can I try ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > ilker
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
> > > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:40 PM
> > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net)
> > > Cc: samuel; serusers@iptel.org
> > > Subject: Re: Authorizing IM requests
> > >
> > > EyeBeam won't use im-rules and SER won't use with privacy-lists. It something else.
> > >
> > >         Vaclav
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 02:24:42PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote:
> > > > Hi Samuel,
> > > >
> > > > Now that presence is working I'm checking xcap possibilities.
> > > > I see that IM xcap authorization is not working.
> > > >
> > > > I don't know what to use in:
> > > > >if (authorize_message("im-rules.xml")){
> > > >
> > > > My client (Eyebeam) does not use im-rules.xml , but it uses
> > > > privacy-lists.xml and that file is in privacy-lists folder.  How
> > > > should I change the configuration line to use this file ?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > ilker
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: samuel [mailto:samu60@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 5:26 PM
> > > > To: Vaclav Kubart
> > > > Cc: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net); serusers@iptel.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] PA error sending notifies
> > > >
> > > > 2006/5/16, Vaclav Kubart <vaclav.kubart@iptel.org>:
> > > > > reply inline...
> > > > > > If you are using XCAP authentication for MESSAGEs, there's a
> > > > > > function called authorize_message that needs to have as
> > > > > > parameter the file name of the IM ruleset.
> > > > > > For user sam, in xcap-root/im-rules/users/sam/im-rules.xml
> > > > > > there are the rules for this function. The XML file is
> > > > > > similar to the presence-rules but has important differences
> > > > > > (correct me if I'm wrong,
> > > > > > Vaclav!!!):
> > > > > > *it only has a blacklist parameter (no whitelist!!)
> > > > >
> > > > > It doesn't depend on name of the rule
> > > > > (blacklist/whitelist/...) it depends on the action (block,
> > > > > ...). You can have as many rules as you want, but to
> > > > > explicitly enable something
> > > > > (whitelist) is needless because MESSSAGEs are allowed by
> > > > > default (at the end of the presence handbook I tried to
> > > > > describe im-rules the same way as presence-rules are described in their draft).
> > > > >
> > > > > > *the namespace is different (so be carefull in copy&paste
> > > > > > from the
> > > > > > presence-rules!!!) and, as Vaclav poitned out "proprietary"
> > > > > > from iptel.
> > > > >
> > > > > And the action element name differs: <im-handling> is used
> > > > > instead of <sub-handling>.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Uops...I haven't noticed :P thanks!
> > > >
> > > > >         Vaclav
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > About the structure I have: x86 debian testing. Libraries
> > > > > > versions I don't know exactly but the ones in the testing
> > > > > > repository EXCEPT a library which I had to get for serweb
> > > > > > from the stable version...but it's not affecting SER part.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Samuel.
> > > > > > 2006/5/16, ?lker Aktuna   (Koç. net  ) <ilkera@koc.net>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >What did  you mean by following:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>Instead of
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> if (authorize_message("http://localhost/xcap")) {
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>there should be
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>if (authorize_message("im-rules.xml")){
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Btw, did you receive my email with following questions :
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>> I have the same problem with notification and other
> > > > > > >>> presence messages
> > > > > > >with you.
> > > > > > >>> Can you tell me which Linux distribution you are using Ser on ?
> > > > > > >>> Also please include version numbers for libraries that
> > > > > > >>> are required by
> > > > > > >Ser.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> I am trying to find similarities between yours and my ser server.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Regards,
> > > > > > >ilker
> > > > > > >
>
>
>