Maybe you can describe in a bit more detail the situation where SER is supposed to CANCEL the other branches, but does not?
g-)

samuel wrote:

Hi all,

Just a question about transaction matching in SER 0.9.7:

In a forked request, SER receives a reply with a ;received=IP parameter after the branch parameter in the Via header and I don't know if this can affect parallel forking because it does not CANCEL the other branches....

Thanks,
Samuel.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
  