Alex,
I read the OP's requirements like this. They want to implement a redirect server that will:
* Receive a SIP INVITE * Make a single http request that has a RTT of 200ms * Copy a header from the HTTP reply to a SIP 300 reply * Handle the ACK for the reply
Is it your opinion this cannot be implemented reliably with Kamailio on a 4vCPUs and 4GB RAM host at a rate of 750 INVITE requests per second?
Kaufman Senior Voice Engineer
E: bkaufman@bcmone.com
SIP.US Client Support: 800.566.9810 | SIPTRUNK Client Support: 800.250.6510 | Flowroute Client Support: 855.356.9768
[img]https://www.sip.us/ [img]https://www.siptrunk.com/ [img]https://www.flowroute.com/
________________________________ From: Alex Balashov via sr-users sr-users@lists.kamailio.org Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2024 12:17 PM To: sr-users@lists.kamailio.org sr-users@lists.kamailio.org Cc: Alex Balashov abalashov@evaristesys.com Subject: [SR-Users] Re: Kamailio not receiving packets on high CPS
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
On Dec 19, 2024, at 1:08 pm, Ben Kaufman bkaufman@bcmone.com wrote:
I'm arguing that http requests can be done sanely, and you're saying they shouldn't be done at all.
Not if you want the most performance, no.
-- Alex Balashov Principal Consultant Evariste Systems LLC Web: https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fevaristesy...https://evaristesys.com/ Tel: +1-706-510-6800
__________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- sr-users@lists.kamailio.org To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!