Re: [Serusers] [Sems] Poll on dropping unix socket interface ("unixsockctrl")

Hi Raphael, What are the advantages of binrpcctrl and sipctrl over the unixsockctrl? Has enough testing done on them? We are currently using SEMS with SER0.9.6 (with unixsockctrl) and it is working OK for us. IF we move to the binrpcctrl or sipctrl would we get a better performance? Thanks --Srinivas -----Original Message----- From: sems-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org [mailto:sems-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Raphael Coeffic Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 7:00 AM To: sems(a)lists.iptel.org Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: [Sems] Poll on dropping unix socket interface ("unixsockctrl") Hi *! with the emergence of the binary RPC interface for SER2 ("binrcpctrl" plug-in), and SEMS' own sip stack ("sipctrl" plug-in), Stefan and I believe that the unix socket control interface is defeated. That's why we would like to know who is in favor of dropping support for the unix socket interface. Cheers and happy polling! Stefan & Raphael. _______________________________________________ Sems mailing list Sems(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems