Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

Hello Daniel, Here debug of the notify which failing. Look like transaction miss match http://fpaste.org/196896/61168591/ Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" &lt;miconda(a)gmail.com&gt; To: "Slava Bendersky" &lt;volga629(a)networklab.ca&gt;ca>, "sr-users" &lt;sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org&gt; Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 5:44:05 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, it doesn't matter if there is a mix of transports. If the UA is mirroring the Record-Route headers in the response to the NOTIFY, it should work fine. Cheers, Daniel On 11/03/15 21:40, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, Is this matter that UDP and TCP transport in mix ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" &lt;volga629(a)networklab.ca&gt; To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" &lt;sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org&gt; Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:21:39 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello Daniel, I have record route in WITHINDLG for NOTIFY, but it not helped behaviour is the same it loosing route for NOTIFY. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" &lt;miconda(a)gmail.com&gt; To: "Slava Bendersky" &lt;volga629(a)networklab.ca&gt; , "sr-users" &lt;sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org&gt; Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 2:14:02 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, you have to do record_route() for all NOTIFY requests -- there are new specs requiring that (RFC 6665) and perhaps asterisk is following them. If you look in the default kamailio.cfg for v4.2, inside route[WITHINDLG], then you will see how it is done. Cheers, Daniel On 11/03/15 14:22, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, Here fresh paste http://fpaste.org/196616/42608006/ I see proper routing headers on SUBSCRIBE, but then NOTIFY loose it. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" &lt;miconda(a)gmail.com&gt; To: "sr-users" &lt;sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org&gt; Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, fpaste link doesn't show anything. Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers? Cheers, Daniel On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Everyone, Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly. asterisk ---> private kamailio public ----> soft client http://fpaste.org/196257/99948714/ I see kamailio trying connect always with private IP to the client when NOTIFY is come is in. Is this something to do with rr_advertise_address ? Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5064 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64e2800 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 33, -1, 0x10) fd_no=24 called Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4320]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: entering timer for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 (ticks=839577436, timeout=839634956 (3595 s), wr_timeout=839577436 (0 s)), write queue: 798 bytes Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5066 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 34, -1, 0x10) fd_no=23 called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 I have in configuration in WITHINDLG if (is_method("NOTIFY")) { record_route(); } and in NATDETECT if(is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE|NOTIFY")) { set_contact_alias(); } Slava. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com