On So, 2007-12-22 at 15:53 +0100, Tomasz Zieleniewski wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> Unfortunately attr_destination and xlset_destination are not allow in
> the branch route.
> When one can expect the patch and those functions to be available in
> main tree??
>
> Tomasz
>
> On Dec 21, 2007 4:34 PM, Michal Matyska <
michal@iptel.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> you can try to use patch available here:
>
http://tracker.iptel.org/browse/SER-213
>
> Unfortunately it did not move into the main tree yet (and
> might be
> little bit outdated at the moment).
>
> attr_destination and xlset_destination are available in the
> branch route
> and branch value is available using @tm.xxx select I think.
>
> Michal
>
>
> On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 14:29 +0100, Tomasz Zieleniewski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have following issue.
> > All my outgoing requests are forwarded through boundary
> proxy
> > by setting the destination before t_relay()
> > my problem is when there is another branch created.
> > This second branch is routed in the standard SIP way
> > directly to destination in request URI.
> > How can I force also branches to go through my
> > boundary proxy.
> > Can I somehow check in branch_route that this branch is not
> the first
> > one (not first message)
> > but the second and and change the destination and make
> t_relay()?
> >
> > Thank You for any feedback
> >
> > Regards
> > Tomasz
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> >
Serusers@lists.iptel.org> >
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers>
>