22 Jul
2005
22 Jul
'05
7:54 p.m.
On Friday 22 July 2005 01:06 pm, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
I see. That's a pity. BTW I can't find it in the roadmap available online.
The review explicitly mentions the migration to the memory manager used
by ser.
Sorry, it wasn't clear for me that this is about connection pool implementation.
Hello,
I've asked this question in serusers and serdevel. Noone answered,
so I thought I'd ask it here about openser.
I haven't tried openser yet, it's on my todo list.
I saw that openser implemented connection pool for mysql backend.
What about postgres?
The maintainer of this module has not implemented the connection pool
yet. It was no activity for quite some time of postgres module,but now
seems that many users started using it, so we have put it in the roadmap
to review. Unfortunately I have no experience with postgres, so the
priority is quite low in my list.
sorry, that was a misleading info from my side, I was
thinking to a
wrong bitmask present in openser. You can start as many as children you
want.
Thanks for the info.
Daniel
--
See you later,
Michael