Thank you for the replies, this has been helpful.


So if I do want to go down this road and want to practically implement a solution, what is the best method of appending additional record route headers to a 200 OK response?
I guess, specifically, adding them to the 200 OK response that is given by kamailio to a re-invite.

Thank you,
Jack Davis

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov@evaristesys.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:44:31PM -0600, Jack Davis wrote:

> What kind of problems can arise from inserting said header?

Theoretically, none. It should be ignored, as per the RFC. Moreover, the
RFC doesn't _prohibit_ such a header in an in-dialog request, so you are
probably clear to add it. Fundamentally, § 12.2 says:

   Requests within a dialog MAY contain Record-Route and Contact header
   fields. However, these requests do not cause the dialog's route set
   to be modified...

I have certainly seen instances in the field where RRs in in-dialog
requests are not ignored, however. That's on the endpoints, of course,
but it can make things worse.

> I'm trying to find a way to get a pesky setup to start behaving, of course,
> without requiring them to make any changes.

That's always a tough gig.

--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC

Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users