Re: [OpenSER-Users] loose_route() and t_relay(proto:host:port, [flags])

El Lunes, 9 de Junio de 2008, Anatoly Pidruchny escribió:

Daniel,

thank you, that works! But then, currently it does not make any sense to call t_relay() with a parameter when $du is set, because the parameter is going to be ignored. The priority of either $du or the parameter of t_relay() is not really clear from the documentation. But, IMHO, the parameter of t_relay function has to have greater priority then $du. Any comments? Should I open a bug report for this?

I agree with you. It makes sense that a explicit destination set as "t_relay()" parameter should be the final destination instead of Route headers.

Please, report a bug about it :)