I mean that algorithm of creating new headers of creating INVOTE message is the same for branch_branch route and single client. Only one difference i that I use $ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:} vs append_branch("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})")

This is full algo of my reqest
the first is I check at location table num of endpoints for this peer and then at the "while" do this

                                                sql_pvquery("ca", "select received from location where contact='$dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])'","$var(recieved)");

$du=$var(recieved);

xlog("L_INFO","SQL query return recieved {$var(recieved)} for {$tU}. Destination is {$du}\n");

# if only one client used it means that I use $ru

if ($dbr(ra=>rows)==1)

{

xlog("L_INFO","Single ANGENT");

xlog("L_INFO","WS Branch is {$du)} for {$tU}\n");

rtpengine_manage("force trust-address replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=force RTP/SAVPF");

t_on_reply("REPLY_FROM_WS");

$ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:});

route("FINAL_RELAY");

}

else

{

append_branch("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})","0.7");

}

#after while ended if more that one endpoint used 

t_on_branch("1");
return;

branch_route[1]{

if($du=~"transport=ws"){

xlog("L_INFO","Websocket Branch is {$du} for {$tU}\n");

rtpengine_manage("force trust-address replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=force RTP/SAVPF");

t_on_reply("REPLY_FROM_WS");

}

else{

xlog("L_INFO","UDP Branch is {$du)} for {$tU}\n");

rtpengine_manage("replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove RTP/AVP");

t_on_reply("MANAGE_CLASSIC_REPLY");

}

}

route[FINAL_RELAY]

{

             

if (!t_relay()) {

sl_reply_error();

}

return;

}

2015-03-16 15:46 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook@gmail.com>:

request_route

2015-03-16 15:43 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com>:

Is this used in request_route or in failure_route or other routing block?

Cheers,
Daniel

On 16/03/15 12:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:

If I use

$ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:});

if (!t_relay()) {

sl_reply_error();

}

I see 

t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for forwarding

Mar 16 11:36:04 Kamailio kamailio[4335]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (6/SL)

 if I use append_branch()
for single client - thats is ok but 2 invites going to client.
So client may pickup call and it successfully established.  

2015-03-16 13:24 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com>:

Hello,

instead of seturi use:

$ru = "sip:" + $tU + "@" + $(du{s.select,1,:});

Cheers,
Daniel

On 16/03/15 05:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:

Now. when I use 

seturi("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})");

I see error at my log

 ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid

 ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed

 ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid

 ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed

 ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)

 ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)

As i see error generate twice maby because I ure t_on branch() route

2015-03-16 7:18 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook@gmail.com>:

Hello. I try to call multi[ple endpoints from my server using append_branch. It works fine but when I have only one endpoint - kamailio generate 2 INVITE requests to it.
As I understand it is original request and the next one is branch. 
I used seturi() before for sending original reqest to destination, but I can not see this function at kamailio 4.3.
Kamailio 4.3 uses send() dunnction? but it works at stateless mode. I need analog of it or seturi that works at statefull mode.

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com