8 Oct
2007
8 Oct
'07
1:48 p.m.
El Monday 08 October 2007 12:37:59 Juha Heinanen escribió:
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
it is better that anca comments on this.
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. Could you repeat please?
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
why
doesn't pua_usrloc generate a publish that corresponds to current
published status of the device?
That's good idea. In fact, why to generate a new PUBLISH if already
exists a "real" PUBLISH? why not just modify "expires" and
"received_time" in "presentity" table?