hello Daniel

thanks a lot.
we actually will start testing 5.0 to migrate to it, but in the meantime it's great if we can patch it on the 4.4

best regards
david


El mar, 28-03-2017 a las 13:37 +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió:
Hello,

I pushed a safety checks to avoid crash in this situation. I will have to investigate deeper why it got to this state, but for now the fix should avoid this crash in a similar situation. You have to use the latest branch 4.4 or backport the patch e20b38e0084c1f89c43a921a8a2affbea060aaa5 to your version.

Cheers,
Daniel



On 28/03/2017 12:15, David Escartín Almudévar wrote:

hello Daniel

it happened only once as far as i know, i tried to duplicate by myself but i couldnt create the sipp scenario
i will try to duplicate it setting the octal parameters in hex escaped by % in the SIP uris to see if i can, but i didnt have time yet

in the meantime here you have the information

(gdb) frame 6
#6  0x00000000004696c4 in dns_srv_sip_resolvehost (name=0x7f6906943188, port=0x7fff120795e2, proto=0x7fff120795e1 "\001\330\023") at dns_cache.c:2679
2679 he=dns_get_he(name, dns_flags);
(gdb) p *name
$1 = {s = 0x0, len = 0}
(gdb) p *port
$2 = 5080

thanks a lot and regards
david



El lun, 27-03-2017 a las 21:04 +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió:
Hello,

did it happen only once, or it can be reproduced?

Can you also get from gdb:

frame 6

p *name

p *port


Cheers,
Daniel



On 27/03/2017 16:43, David Escartín Almudévar wrote:

hello Daniel

here you have

(gdb) frame 1
#1  0x000000000045b472 in _dns_hash_find (name=0x7f6906943188, type=1, h=0x7fff120793cc, err=0x7fff120793ac) at dns_cache.c:535
535 *h=dns_hash_no(name->s, name->len, type);
(gdb) info locals
e = 0x7f69069015b8
tmp = 0x7f69069247e0
ret = 0x0
now = 689922868
cname_chain = 0
cname = {s = 0xab0e93 "Via: SIP/2.0/UDP \020?\337\v\234\262\264\016 :5080;received=;rport=5080;branch=\020?\337\v\234\262\264\016 \r\nContent-Length: 0\r\n\r\n", len = 11210375}
__FUNCTION__ = "_dns_hash_find"
(gdb) list
530 cname_chain=0;
531 ret=0;
532 now=get_ticks_raw();
533 *err=0;
534 again:
535 *h=dns_hash_no(name->s, name->len, type);
536 #ifdef DNS_CACHE_DEBUG
537 LM_DBG("(%.*s(%d), %d), h=%d\n", name->len, name->s, name->len, type, *h);
538 #endif
539 clist_foreach_safe(&dns_hash[*h], e, tmp, next){



thanks a lot and regards
david




El lun, 27-03-2017 a las 13:54 +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió:
Hello,

the backtrace is no longer matching the 4.4 branch code, as you run an older release in that series.

Can you get with gdb from the core the output of the following commands:

frame 1

info locals

list


and send them here on the mailing list.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 24/03/2017 14:50, David Escartín Almudévar wrote:

hello all, Daniel

checking the core with the gdb, we have checked the variables at the frames of the backtrace, to try to get the full sip message seems it seemed truncated.
checking the buf variable of the frame 11 which theorically contains the sip msg to parse we have the string


SIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated\r\nFrom: \"881237046977\"<sip:881237046977@79.170.68.185;user=phone>;tag=B7jgc8jQ4m5pB\r\nTo: <sip:5926053324@79.170.68.186:5060>;tag=e0d50be-13c4-58d47cba-a2ed9808-36fa\r\nl\337K\016\213\347: \344\003\r\nCSeq: 104824272 INVITE\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP L\263\264\016\020?\337\v\234\262\264\016 ;branch=\327\f\340\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP \020?\337\v\234\262\264\016 :5080;received=;rport=5080;branch=\020?\337\v\234\262\264\016 \r\nContent-Length: 0\r\n\r\n

this is i guess how gdb parses the message, so i guess i cannot introduce this like that in a xml sipp formal, since CRLF is represented as \r\n, so others parts like l\337K\016\213\347: \344\003 i have no idea what they are, because they also seem to be out of the ASCII table ¿?
anycase, seems the message is very bad formed, and the kamailio tries to resolve the host of the Via and it gets nothing, so the function get_hash1_case_raw is fed by a nul value and seems that the reason it crashes

hope you can retrieve information from that message to find out what kind of message it exactly is and see if it's possible to avoid kamailio's crash in this scenario


best regards
david



El vie, 24-03-2017 a las 12:10 +0100, David Escartín Almudévar escribió:
hello all

we have experienced a crash and tracing the logs and the core, seems it was because a sip response from an endpoint.
a UDP receiver (26248) crashed and the last message we see on it is a 487 quite bad formed

Mar 24 01:58:02 mia-proxy-inout-1-stby /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[26248]: ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1055]: t_check_msg(): ERROR: reply doesn't have a via, cseq or call-id header
Mar 24 01:58:17 mia-proxy-inout-1-stby /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[26230]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:739]: handle_sigs(): child process 26248 exited by a signal 11


the backtrace of the core
(gdb) backtrace
#0  0x0000000000457ab9 in get_hash1_case_raw (s=0x0, len=0) at hashes.h:210
#1  0x000000000045b472 in _dns_hash_find (name=0x7f6906943188, type=1, h=0x7fff120793cc, err=0x7fff120793ac) at dns_cache.c:535
#2  0x0000000000461285 in dns_hash_get (name=0x7f6906943188, type=1, h=0x7fff120793cc, err=0x7fff120793ac) at dns_cache.c:762
#3  0x0000000000467194 in dns_get_entry (name=0x7f6906943188, type=1) at dns_cache.c:2102
#4  0x0000000000468a05 in dns_a_get_he (name=0x7f6906943188) at dns_cache.c:2432
#5  0x0000000000468bb9 in dns_get_he (name=0x7f6906943188, flags=1) at dns_cache.c:2505
#6  0x00000000004696c4 in dns_srv_sip_resolvehost (name=0x7f6906943188, port=0x7fff120795e2, proto=0x7fff120795e1 "\001\330\023") at dns_cache.c:2679
#7  0x000000000046aa37 in dns_sip_resolvehost (name=0x7f6906943188, port=0x7fff120795e2, proto=0x7fff120795e1 "\001\330\023") at dns_cache.c:2849
#8  0x000000000049519e in update_sock_struct_from_via (to=0x7fff12079708, msg=0x7f69069a1dd8, via=0x7f69068f82a8) at forward.c:704
#9  0x0000000000495ee5 in do_forward_reply (msg=0x7f69069a1dd8, mode=0) at forward.c:766
#10 0x00000000004970af in forward_reply (msg=0x7f69069a1dd8) at forward.c:849
#11 0x00000000005197ef in receive_msg (
    buf=0xab0d80 "SIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated\r\nFrom: \"8888888888\"<sip:8888888888@7.7.7.7;user=phone>;tag=B7jgc8jQ4m5pB\r\nTo: <sip:555555555@8.8.8.8:5060>;tag=e0d50be-13c4-58d47cba-a2ed9808-36fa\r\nl\337K\016"..., len=367, rcv_info=0x7fff12079a10) at receive.c:299
#12 0x0000000000627b43 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:495
#13 0x00000000004b107a in main_loop () at main.c:1600
#14 0x00000000004b842f in main (argc=13, argv=0x7fff12079fb8) at main.c:2616


i have tried to duplicate the issue, but i dont know how to translate l\337K\016 to a xml notation
i guess this is some weird that cannot be processed for kamailio

could you please take a look and let me know if you know how to duplicate and fix this crash?

thanks a lot and regards
david



_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 6-8 (Europe) and Mar 20-22 (USA) - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 6-8 (Europe) and Mar 20-22 (USA) - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com


-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com