10 Jul
2014
10 Jul
'14
noon
Hi Alex,
Thank you for your answer.
But I'm not sure to understand.
If I have only one case with set_rtp_proxy_set, are the other calls of the
rtpproxy_manage() (or similar) will be load-balanced between the two sets?
Is it possible to avoid load-balance and be sure that outside my
set_rtp_proxy_set("2"), the first one will be used?
Regards,
Igor.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] De la part de Alex Balashov
Envoyé : mardi 8 juillet 2014 19:55
À : sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] set_rtp_proxy_set behaviour
Hi Igor,
On 07/08/2014 01:44 PM, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
Hello,
I set two entries of rtpproxy like :
modparam("rtpproxy", "rtpproxy_sock", "1 ==
udp:127.0.0.1:7722")
modparam("rtpproxy", "rtpproxy_sock", "2 ==
udp:127.0.0.1:7723")
For a particular case, I want to use the second RTPProxy and the first
one as the default one.
If in a conditional block I set set_rtp_proxy(2), all other call to
rtpproxy_manage will use the first RTPProxy? Or there is a
load-balancing introduce by default.
Load-balancing by default is within a set. Since you have two different sets
defined, forcing one or the other with set_rtp_proxy_set() will result in
only one of those proxies being used.
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
Please be kind to the English language:
http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/232906
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users