14 Oct
2010
14 Oct
'10
5:03 p.m.
Is Record-Route: a,b,c
analog of
Record-Route: a
Record-Route: b
Record-Route: c
or
Record-Route: c
Record-Route: b
Record-Route: a
?
On Thursday 14 October 2010, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Morten Isaksen writes:
When OpenSer sends the message to Kamailio the
recourd-routes look like
this:
Record-Route: <sip:x.x.248.20;r2=on;lr;ftag=3d9e7d131b>
Record-Route: <sip:x.x.248.20;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr;ftag=3d9e7d131b>
But when the message comes back from Kamailio it is:
Record-Route:
<sip:x.x.248.7;lr=on;ftag=3d9e7d131b;did=584.1a683a45>,<sip:x.x.248.20;r2
=on;lr;ftag=3d9e7d131b>,<sip:x.x.248.20;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr;ftag=3d9e7d
131b>
OpenSER forwards the message to the OCS with Record-route unchanged
and the OCS gets confused and does not reply.
then file a bug to ocs folks, because ocs should understand r-r header
that contains more than one entry.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users